Filewrapper®

Federal Circuit Weighs in on Abbreviated Biosimilar Applications
July 23, 2015

The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) establishes an abbreviated pathway for regulatory approval of follow-on biological products that are highly similar to a previously approved product (the reference product).  The general structure of the abbreviated pathway, referred to as "biosimilar" licensure , is similar to that used for Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDA) unde....... Read More


Impact of eBay on Injunctive Relief
July 20, 2015

Both preliminary and permanent injunctions can be crucial forms of relief in any patent case. In addition to preventing continuing infringement of a patent, an injunction puts the patent holder in a much better bargaining position for future licensing negotiations. In its eBay decision in 2006, the Supreme Court required lower courts to apply a four-part common law test for granting injunctive relief. Prio....... Read More


Octane Fitness in Practice: Federal Circuit Applies Supreme Court Attorney Fees Standard
July 14, 2015
Post by Marcus A. Smetka

The Supreme Court decision in Octane Fitness LLC v. ICON Health and Fitness (previously discussed on Filewrapper®) changed the standard for awarding attorney fees in patent suits to the prevailing party in exceptional cases under Section 258 of the patent statute. In Octane Fitness, the Court further defined “exceptional cases” to mean those "that stands out from others with respect to the substanti....... Read More


The Continuing Saga of the First IPR at the Federal Circuit
July 09, 2015

    The Federal Circuit has simultaneously issued an order and an opinion in In re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC, previously discussed on Filewrapper® as being the first appeal arising from an inter partes review (“IPR”) . The order issued by the Federal Circuit is a denial of the Petition for En Banc Rehearing to consider appl....... Read More


Kimble v. Marvel—SCOTUS Declines to Overturn Brulotte
June 26, 2015

            Patent portfolios are often a substantial asset to business associations, and even for the individual inventor an issued patent or two can be Big Business. Patent assignments (i.e. wholesale buying and selling of patents and patent applications) are not the only ways to trade in the commodity. Many transactions take the form of licenses or assignment in exchan....... Read More


Teva v. Sandoz Revisited
June 25, 2015

Teva v. Sandoz Revisited On June 18, 2015, a Federal Circuit panel reaffirmed that the key claim of the patent at issue inTeva v. Sandoz, was invalid as indefinite. The procedural posture and technical background leading up to this decision is discussed in aprior blog post.  The Federal Circuit ultimately concluded that they are still allowed to address if the question of law regarding indefiniteness....... Read More


Supreme Court Weighs in on Belief of Patent Invalidity and Induced Infringement
June 24, 2015
Post by Daniel M. Lorentzen, Ph.D.

Under 35 U.S.C. § 271, a party can be held liable for infringement of a patent under in a number of different ways. The most common liability is for direct, literal infringement of the patent, meaning that accused party actually practices every element of the asserted patent claim(s). The statute also includes provisions for liability based on importation products (§ 271(g)); contributory infringement ....... Read More


Geographical Scope of Permanent Injunctions Challenged
June 17, 2015

  Federal trademark rights are generally enforceable throughout the United States.  However, confusion can arise where contrary decisions have been made by district courts in different geographical regions relating to the same mark. The Fourth Circuit’s March decision in Georgia Pacific Consumer Prods. LP v. Von Dreble Corp, an appeal from the Eastern District of North Carolina, provides an exem....... Read More


Thank you
June 05, 2015

Thank you for reading Filewrapper. To continue getting updates, be sure to sign up below. Click the box next to "Subscribe to: Filewrapper Blog Updates."  .... Read More


"Intangible" Software Unpatentable? — AllVoice Developments v. Microsoft
May 28, 2015

  In this non-precedential opinion (Fed. Cir. 2015) the Court held claims 60-68 of U.S. Patent No. 5,799,273 (the “’273 Patent”) invalid under 35. U.S.C. § 101 as not being directed to one of the four statutory categories of inventions identified in 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim 60 is set forth below: 60. A universal speech-recognition interface that enables operative coupling of a speech-recognition engine....... Read More


Search Posts

Purpose

The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.

Disclaimer

McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole.

Sign Up For Our Newsletter

Enter your name and email address to recieve the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Vorhees & Sease, P.L.C.

Dedicated to the practice of intellectual property law and service to clients as a faithful advocate.