USPTO Heightens Post-Registration Requirements for Trademarks

March 16, 2017
Post by Brandon W. Clark

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has recently made changes to the post-registration requirements for U.S. trademark registrations. Effective March 21, 2017, the USPTO will implement a post-registration audit program intended to obtain additional evidence and ensure accuracy of claims that a trademark is in use in commerce in connection with the goods/services listed in the registration.

The Lanham (Trademark) Act requires a number of post-registration filings with the USPTO. Currently, the owner of a federally registered trademark must submit a Declaration of Use between the fifth and sixth anniversary of the initial registration of the trademark. Additionally, the owner must also submit a Declaration of Use within a one-year period prior to the tenth anniversary, and every ten years after, of the initial registration. Along with the Declaration of Use the owner must also submit a specimen showing how the mark is currently used on one product or service in each registered class. Currently, the USPTO only requires one specimen of use per class, regardless of the total number of goods or services identified in each class. When a registration identifies more than one product or service within the same class, the post-registration audit program will allow the USPTO to request evidence of use (specimens, information, exhibits, or affidavits) on additional products and services. 

If the owner is unable to provide proof of use for all of the goods or services, those goods or services will be deleted from the registration. Failure to respond to the request will result in cancellation of the entire registration. To avoid the uncertainty and expense of receiving and responding a post-registration request, trademark owners may wish to voluntarily provide valid specimens of use for all goods and services in the registration with the initial (Section 8) filing or remove terms/products that are no longer being used in commerce. This is especially so for registrations that cover a minimal number of products or services.

These changes are a result of the USPTO's two-year study in which owners of more than fifty percent of five hundred randomly chosen registrations were unable to verify use of the registered mark for all of the goods or services for which the mark was registered. In light of these heightened post-registration procedures, trademark owners should conduct a detailed review of their trademark registrations that are up for maintenance filings or renewals, and should consider identifying specimens of use for all goods or services in each class. 

Brandon W. Clark is the Chair of the Copyright, Entertainment, and Media Law Practice Group at McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC. For additional information please visit or contact Brandon directly via email at

Post Categories

Comments (0)
Post a Comment

Captcha Image
Return to the Filewrapper Blog

Search Posts


The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.


McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole.

Connect with MVS

Enter your name and email address to recieve the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.