USPTO Director Andrei Lancu Takes a Look at Early Prosecution

May 24, 2018
Post by Oliver P. Couture, Ph.D.

This week, the USPTO Director, Andrei Iancu, testified before the House Judiciary Committee. In his written statement Director Iancu wrote on topics related to early prosecution that would result in lower costs to clients and would speed up the process of obtaining a patent.

A new pilot program that will allow for a pre-search Examiner interview is being planned. The goal of the interview is to allow claim interpretation to happen before running any search. By clearing up confusion early, the Examiner can perform better initial searches to identify relevant prior art for fewer issues in the first Office Action. This would allow replies to be more effective toward obtaining a patent.

Examiner training was also addressed with three different areas of continual training being mentioned: legal, quality, and technology. Examiners this year have already undergone training for § 101 and are currently undergoing § 112(f) training. Later this year Examiners will receive training for §§ 102, 103, and 112(a), legal analysis and writing, unity of invention, Examiner’s answers, and double patenting. Technical training, held at the USPTO or in institutions within the U.S., will keep Examiners up-to-date in their field. The combined training should result in better written Office Actions which are more relevant, both legally and technically, to the application.

By clearing up confusion in the earliest stages and keeping Examiners current in their field, the first Office Action will be more relevant, allowing for the reply to better address rejections early in prosecution. Ultimately, this should allow faster prosecution and lower costs to clients.



Oliver P. Couture is an Intellectual Property Attorney in the Biotechnology/Chemical Patent Practice Group at McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC. For additional information please visit or contact Oliver directly via email at oliver.couture .




Post Categories

Comments (0)
Post a Comment

Captcha Image
Return to the Filewrapper Blog

Search Posts


The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.


McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole.

Connect with MVS

Enter your name and email address to recieve the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.