Protecting Your Nanotechnology Inventions - Part 4: Don’t Forget About Trade Secret Protection

December 31, 2018
Post by Jonathan L. Kennedy

When you have a new invention, the right question to ask at the outset is whether you want to consider patenting it. This is important because many common activities in research and commercialization can create a bar to patent protection or at least start a one-year clock by which a patent must be filed. Some of these common activities include presenting or publishing on the technology, testing the technology with a customer or commercial partner, selling product, or publicly using the technology. While there is so much early focus on preliminary patent questions, a thorough analysis should also include an assessment of whether trade secret protection may be suitable.

In fact, even where a product may be patentable, there can be aspects of the technology kept as trade secret. To file a patent, there is an obligation to fully describe how to make and use the invention. Further, there is an obligation to disclose the best mode of the invention. In some circumstances that may mean that you must choose between patent and trade secret protection. In other circumstances, you may be able to seek patent protection on one aspect of a new technology while keeping other aspects of the technology secret. There is often technical know-how that is acquired while developing patentable technology that may be subject to trade secret protection. Additionally, there are instances where certain technologies and improvements are not patentable, but a commercial advantage can be gained and innovation can be monetized by keeping aspects of the technology under trade secret protection.

Certain basic criteria must be met to qualify for trade secret protection. Those criteria typically include at least the following:

  • Information that actually or potentially provides independent economic value from not being generally known;
  • The owner has taken reasonable measures to keep the information secret; and
  • The information is not readily ascertainable through proper means.

Such information can often include scientific, technical, engineering, economic, financial, and business information. A unique aspect of trade secret protection is that there are both state and federal protections available. This means that there is the potential for both state and federal actions to preserve a trade secret. This can also complicate whether the information qualifies as a trade secret or whether additional elements may be required to establish trade secret protection in a particular state.

One consideration particularly applicable to nanotechnological inventions is whether there are aspects that are difficult to reverse engineer. There is certainly some information that can be readily reverse engineered through analytical techniques and other information that is extremely difficult to reverse engineer. Considering what aspects of your technology would be difficult to reverse engineer is a great place to start in evaluating whether trade secret protection may be suitable. The answer to that question may inform what parts of your technology you want to make public.

To keep trade secret protection a possibility, it is important to have precautions in place at all stages of research and development. What precautions are needed vary based on many things, including the nature of your research (public vs. private), nature of research facilities, who has access to sensitive information, etc. Certain precautions can always be helpful: limiting access to confidential information; having non-disclosure agreements in place, having secured and limited access to research facilities or at least labs where confidential research occurs; and having a process in place for early identification of potential trade secret information.  Whether trade secret protection is possible and advisable for a particular technology can be evaluated with your intellectual property attorney.

This is the final post in a four-part series. The first three posts can be accessed at the following links: “Protecting Your Nanotechnology Inventions – Part 1: Defining Your Space”; “Protecting Your Nanotechnology Inventions – Part 2: Defining Your Invention”; and “Protecting Your Nanotechnology Inventions – Part 3: Enabling Your Invention.”

Jonathan L. Kennedy, is a Patent Attorney in the Biotechnology & Chemical Practice Group at McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC. For additional information, please visit or contact Jonathan directly via email at

Post Categories

Comments (0)
Post a Comment

Captcha Image
Return to the Filewrapper Blog

Search Posts


The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.


McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole.

Connect with MVS

Enter your name and email address to recieve the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.