Filewrapper®

Expanded Trademark Rights for Some Hemp-Related Products and Services

May 15, 2019
Post by Christine Lebron-Dykeman

Following up on the May 10, 2019, MVS Filewrapper post “Big Changes Ahead for Plant Variety Protection (PVP)”, the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) has also recently issued some guidance on how the 2018 Farm Bill affect trademark applications for cannabis and CBD products. Per the guidelines issued May 2, 2019, the USPTO will now approve some cannabis/CBD applications, but with a few significant caveats:

  1. Applications filed on or after December 20, 2018 for Non-Food/Beverage/Dietary Supplement/Pet Treat Products

For Non Food/Beverage/Dietary Supplement/Pet Treat Products trademark applications filed on or after December 20, 2018, to the extent the cannabis or CBD goods identified contain no more than 0.3% THC on a dry-weight basis, the use is now legal under U.S. law, and the trademark can be registered by USPTO.

2. Applications filed before December 20, 2018 for Non-Food/Beverage/Dietary Supplement/Pet Treat Products

For trademark applications filed before December 20, 2018 to the extent they identify goods encompassing CBD or other cannabis products, registration will be still be refused because such applications did not have a valid basis to support registration at the time of filing because the goods violated federal law, and thus there could be no bona fide intent to lawfully use in the U.S. However, the examiners are instructed to advise applicants they may request to amend filing dates to December 20, 2018 (and thereafter a new search will be conducted for conflicting marks).

3. Applications for Food/Beverage/Dietary Supplement/Pet Treat Products

The 2018 Farm Bill explicitly preserved U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) authority to regulate products containing cannabis or cannabis-derived compounds under the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). To date, the FDA has made no changes, and thus CBD remained identified as an active ingredient in FDA-approved drugs and is a substance undergoing clinical investigations. Registration of marks for foods, beverages, dietary supplements, or pet treats containing CBD will still be refused as unlawful even under the new Farm Bill as such goods may not be introduced lawfully into interstate commerce.

This change will help some applicants to obtain trademark registration for their marks associated with cannabis/CBD -related goods and services, but applicants should carefully consider how the USPTO and FDCA requirements will affect their trademark rights before applying for trademark registration.

Christine Lebron-Dykeman is Chair of the Trademark Practice Group at McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC. For additional information, please visit www.ipmvs.com or contact Christine directly via email at christine.lebron-dykeman@ipmvs.com.


Post Categories

Comments (0)
Post a Comment



Captcha Image
Return to the Filewrapper Blog

Search Posts

Purpose

The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.

Disclaimer

McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole.

Connect with MVS

Enter your name and email address to recieve the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.