Being Old Does Not Equate to Being Less Valuable

July 30, 2018
Post by Blog Staff

Last Friday, a Delaware federal jury awarded IBM Corp. more than $82 million after finding Groupon Inc. infringed four e-commerce patents (5,796,967; 7,072,849; 5,961,601; and 7,631,346). These patents relate generally to online customized advertisement services and so-called single-sign-on technology. The oldest patent has a priority date of July 15, 1988 and was granted on August 18, 1998, almost 20 years ago. The newest patent has a priority date of April 1, 2005 and was granted December 8, 2009. Clearly, at least some of the technologies in these patents were conceived before the web and online shopping became a part of our lives.

Groupon argued that it did not infringe on any valid IBM patents and the asserted patents were old and did not have any value for the operations on the World Wide Web currently used not only by Groupon, but many other websites. Obviously, the jury thought otherwise, especially considering the fact that others are paying for them. After about 10 days of trial, jurors found that Groupon willfully infringed the patents. They were ordered to pay $82.5 million, which is about half of what IBM had sought in the case. However, since the jury found that Groupon’s infringement was willful, it is possible that the judge in this case could triple the damage award in coming weeks. IBM filed the suit against Groupon in 2016 after a three-year negotiation for a license agreement failed.

IBM has not just gone after Groupon. They have been waging war with other online businesses over the same patents. Previously, IBM filed a similar case against Priceline Group Inc., now Booking Holdings Inc., which was dismissed following a settlement that included a $34 million payment by Priceline, with an additional contingent payment due. According to IBM, various companies, including and Google, have already paid for licenses to the same patents.

It is good to be reminded that a patented idea or technology still has value despite its old age.

Xiaohong Liu, Ph.D., is an Intellectual Property Attorney in the Biotechnology & Chemical Patent Practice Group at McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC. He is a native Chinese speaker and would be happy to discuss this topic with you in further detail. For additional information, please visit or contact Xiaohong directly via email at


Post Categories

Comments (0)
Post a Comment

Captcha Image
Return to the Filewrapper Blog

Search Posts


The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.


McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole.

Connect with MVS

Enter your name and email address to recieve the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.