First Circuit: District court’s determination that “duck tour” is nongeneric doesn’t hold water In a lengthy decision last week, the First Circuit held a district court erred in finding the term "duck tour" nongeneric in the context of sightseeing tours on amphibious vehicles. The district court, based largely on the nongenericness of this aspect of the parties' marks, found the plaintiff was likely to succeed in its infringement […] Continue Reading →
Eleventh Circuit: Unsolicited proposals insufficient to show intent to resume use of trademark In a decision Friday, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed a district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, finding the plaintiff had abandoned its trademarks. Although the complaint consisted of both federal and state common law claims, the analysis ultimately came down to whether a valid Lanham Act claim existed, as the remaining […] Continue Reading →
USPTO publishes two new proposed rules packages for trademark cases Today's Federal Register brings with it two sets of proposed rule changes from the USPTO, both dealing with prosecution of trademark cases. The first, entitled "Changes in Requirements for Signature of Documents, Recognition of Representatives, and Establishing and Changing the Correspondence Address in Trademark Cases," addresses the requirements for powers of attorney and similar documents […] Continue Reading →
Tenth Circuit: No trademark infringement, unfair competition, or cybersquatting by parody sites In a decision last week, the Tenth Circuit affirmed a district court's grant of summary judgment finding no trademark infringement, no unfair competition, and no cybersquatting. The district court held, and the Tenth Circuit affirmed, that none of the three elements of a trademark infringement action was proven, namely that the mark was not protectable, […] Continue Reading →
Fifth Circuit passes on eBay’s applicability in trademark cases In a decision last week, the Fifth Circuit affirmed a district court's conclusion it had subject matter jurisdiction over a trademark case, as well as its grant of a preliminary injunction. While the activities giving rise to the claim of trademark infringement took place in Mexico, they had a "substantial effect" on United States commerce, […] Continue Reading →
Eleventh Circuit: eBay may eliminate presumption of irreparable harm in trademark cases In a recent decision, the Eleventh Circuit vacated a district court's injunction against the use of a competitor's trademarks in the meta tags of a defendant's website. The court held that while the plaintiffs had shown likelihood of success on both their trademark infringement and false advertising claims, because the district court relied on a […] Continue Reading →
Second Circuit: Famous marks doctrine doesn’t support NY unfair competition claim In a recent decision, the Second Circuit decided the one outstanding issue from a case it had previously decided in March 2007 (previously blogged here), namely whether the "famous marks" doctrine the court held Congress has not yet incorporated into federal trademark law might support a New York common law claim for unfair competition. The […] Continue Reading →
Second Circuit: Statements made in settlement discussions admissible to prove estoppel In a decision yesterday, the Second Circuit affirmed a jury's findings in a trademark infringement case between Polo Ralph Lauren and the U.S. Polo Association. The jury found that one of the USPA's four marks was likely to cause confusion. The two parties had been involved in a previous lawsuit in the early 1980s, and […] Continue Reading →
Fifth Circuit affirms injunction against trademark infringement in Saudi Arabia In a recent decision, the Fifth Circuit affirmed a district court's finding of infringement and disgorgement of profits, but increased the amount of profits awarded because the defendant failed to provide evidence of its costs to reduce the award. Interestingly, the infringement took place entirely outside the United States, namely in Saudi Arabia. Even though […] Continue Reading →
Seventh Circuit: Operating agreement permitted license of marks, so no trademark infringement In its second trademark decision Friday, the Seventh Circuit clarified what is required for a party to be authorized to use another entity's trademarks. In this case, the plaintiff—one of four founders of two LLC's designed to manage and control a restaurant in Chicago—alleged trademark infringement against the three other co-founders based on the co-founders' […] Continue Reading →