USPTO Issues Patent Fee Changes for 2025 By Andrew J. Morgan In its final rule issued on November 20, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued changes to set or increase certain patent fees. The revised fees will take effect on January 19, 2025. There will not be a new fee for After Final Consideration Pilot 2.0 requests as was proposed, nor will […] Continue Reading →
Increased Fees and Other Changes in USPTO Trademark Filings By Christine Lebron-Dykeman On November 18, 2024, the USPTO issued a final rule to increase certain trademark filing fees. The fees will take effect January 18, 2025. While the per Class fee for filing a standard electronic trademark application has not changed and is still $350 per Class, the USPTO has eliminated the distinction between TEAS Standard and […] Continue Reading →
Leveraging Free Online Tools for DIY Patent Searches: A Guide for Garage Inventors By Connor S. Williams You’ve got an invention—now what? Protecting your work may be the next step, but perhaps you’re unfamiliar with the patent system, don’t know any patent attorneys, or don’t really want to reach out for fear of incurring attorney’s fees. Below I provide two free resources for checking to see if it is worth your time […] Continue Reading →
Diplomatic Conference to Conclude and Adopt a Design Law Treaty By Gregory Lars Gunnerson The USPTO has concluded seeking comments from the public on negotiations at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) regarding a proposed Design Law Treaty (DLT). A diplomatic conference to finalize the treaty will soon be conducted in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, November 11-22, 2024. The comments were intended to inform U.S. government participation in the diplomatic […] Continue Reading →
Beyond the Basics: Leveraging Secondary IP to Protect and Elevate Coffee Shop Branding in a Crowded Market By Sarah M.D. Luth In the crowded coffee shop and roastery industry, establishing a unique brand identity is essential to standing out among competitors. While protecting “central” intellectual property (IP) like brand names, logos, and domain names is absolutely critical, strategically identified and maintained “secondary” intellectual property provides a key avenue through which to establish a strong brand identity […] Continue Reading →
The Long-Standing Rosen-Durling Test used to Assess Nonobviousness of Design Patents is OVERRULED By Gregory Lars Gunnerson The long-standing Rosen-Durling test used to assess nonobviousness of design patents required a primary reference must be “basically the same” as the challenged design claim, and further that any secondary references must be “so related”. The Federal Circuit had never considered the merits of the Rosen-Durling test. Hearing LKQ Corp. v. GM Glob. Tech. Operations […] Continue Reading →
Improvements in the Brazilian Design Patent Practice By Gregory Lars Gunnerson Our esteemed colleagues at Daniel IP report to us that there are exciting new rules that have come into effect for designs in Brazil. They authored the following summary of the new laws. We believe this summary will be extremely useful to many U.S. Applicants considering protection in Brazil in the design space. We highly […] Continue Reading →
USPTO Proposes New Rules that Would Create a New Design Patent Practitioner Bar By Joseph M. Hallman On May 16, 2023, the USPTO published proposed rules that provide for the creation of a new design patent practitioner bar. The proposed design patent practitioner bar would provide for a new designation of practitioner able to practice before the USPTO. This newly proposed designation allows individuals to be classified as design patent practitioners wherein […] Continue Reading →
Design Patents Just Got Easier By Kirk M. Hartung In a short, four page, precedential opinion issued on October 4, 2021, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that design patents are limited to specific articles of manufacture, and not a design in the abstract. In re Surgisil, L.L.P., case number 2020-1940. The patent applicant, Surgisil, filed a design patent […] Continue Reading →
Right to Repair: Infringement or Exhaustion Part 2 This post is part 2 of a series of posts relating to a person’s right to repair your purchased products. Part 1 discussed the general background and several policy arguments surrounding both sides of this issue. This post will discuss the main patent laws and legal doctrine related to the right to repair. The central […] Continue Reading →