UK rejects proposal for 20 year copyright extension for sound recordings Yesterday the UK Department for Culture, Media & Sport issued a report rejecting a suggestion to push for an extension of copyright term in the EU for sound recordings of 20 additional years, from 50 to 70 years. Citing the Gowers Review of the UK's intellectual property framework, the report notes: [The Gowers Review] concluded […] Continue Reading →
Continuation and claims rules to publish “later this summer,” will take effect 60 days later In a press release today, the USPTO announced that the much-rumored new rules regarding continuation applications and claim limits recently approved by the OMB will publish in the Federal Register "later this summer," and will take effect 60 days after publication. The USPTO notes that the abstracts published with the OMB reflect the abstracts from […] Continue Reading →
Invalidity affirmed on double patenting grounds; inequitable conduct finding vacated In the second of two rulings yesterday, the Federal Circuit found the patent on Toprol-XL® (a drug used to treat hypertension, angina, and congestive heart failure) invalid based on obviousness-type double patenting, affirming summary judgment on the issue. The court vacated and remanded the grant of summary judgment of unenforceability due to inequitable conduct, as […] Continue Reading →
Federal Circuit affirms requirement to amend listing of goods to exclude goods in another class In the first of two Federal Circuit rulings today, the court affirmed that the USPTO was within its authority when it refused to allow an applicant to rely on the international classification to clarify ambiguities in the listing of goods for a trademark. In affirming the TTAB, the court emphasized the deference due to the […] Continue Reading →
Senate Judiciary Committee passes Patent Reform Act of 2007 out of committee On Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee passed its version of the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145, House version H.R. 1908) out of committee by a vote of 13-5. The bill is cosponsored by the chairman of that committee, Senator Patrick Leahy, who issued a press release regarding the passage. As with the House […] Continue Reading →
Dismissal and covenant not to sue for past acts divests court of jurisdiction In a case decided today, the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court's dismissal of a patent infringement defendant's counterclaim for invalidity for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The patent holder voluntarily dismissed its claims for infringement and agreed not to sue for acts occurring before the dismissal, and there was an insufficiently "immediate" controversy between […] Continue Reading →
Ex parte Catan: Obviousness at the USPTO in electrical engineering In its third opinion of the day designated precedential, the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences once again affirmed an examiner's obviousness rejections. Specifically, the Board found that Appellant's apparatus incorporating bioauthentication and a consumer electronics device was an obvious solution to a known problem, as all elements of the claims other than the bioauthentication […] Continue Reading →
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences releases three precedential obviousness decisions Today the USPTO Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences designated as precedential three opinions in ex parte appeals from examiner rejections applying the post-KSR obviousness standard. The three cases are each from a different technology center. The cases are: Ex parte Kubin (Tech center 1600—Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry) Ex parte Smith (Tech center 3700—Mechanical Engineering, […] Continue Reading →
Ex parte Kubin: Obviousness at the USPTO in biotechnology As mentioned previously, the BPAI designated an opinion as precedential today addressing the issues of obviousness, enablement, and the written description requirement in the context of biotechnology inventions. These issues were addressed in the context of patenting a gene involved in regulating the immune system. Addressing the obviousness issue, the board determined that the previous […] Continue Reading →
Ex parte Smith: Obviousness at the USPTO in mechanical engineering In another post-KSR opinion designated precedential today, the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences affirmed an Examiner's final rejection of an application under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103. The claims "were combinations which only unite old elements with no change in their respective functions and which yield predictable results," and were thus found to […] Continue Reading →