Filewrapper®

Appeals Court holds Transclean Corporation to its stated position
January 18, 2007
Post by Blog Staff
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided in Transclean v. Jiffy Lube that Transclean should be bound by its repeated statements proffered during the course of litigation and not be allowed to take a contrary position during a second phase of litigation. Transclean is the sole licensee of U.S. Patent No. 5,318,080 that is directed to an apparatus for changing automatic transmission fluid........
Read More


Roundup of media coverage of "MedImmune v. Genentech" decision
January 17, 2007
Post by Blog Staff
After last week's Supreme Court decision in MedImmune v. Genentech holding a patent licensee in good standing need not breach the license agreement in order to bring a claim that the patent is invalid, not infringed, or unenforceable, the media has begun to offer its perspective on the case. Below is a sampling of the media coverage, which basically is in agreement that the decision makes it easier to challen.......
Read More


Trademark "use in commerce" must be lawful to build trademark rights
January 17, 2007
Post by Blog Staff
When is a use in commerce not sufficient to build trademark rights? When that use is unlawful. The Ninth Circuit, in a dispute between two manufacturers of antioxidants made from olive extract, held in an issue of first impression in that circuit that unlawful use in commerce cannot support federal trademark rights. This decision agrees with the Tenth Circuit, apparently the only other Court of Appeal to have d.......
Read More


Limitations of a Claim Come from the Claim Language Itself
January 12, 2007
Post by Blog Staff
In E-Pass Technologies ("E-Pass") v. 3Com Corp., Palm Inc., palmOne, Inc. and Handspring, Inc. and Visa International Service Association and Visa U.S.A., Inc. and Palmsource, Inc. ("3Com"), the district court's holding of final summary judgment of non-infringement by 3Com was affirmed by the Federal Circuit. At issue was a patent ("the '311 patent") entitled "Method and Device for Simplifying th.......
Read More


"Trademark" as a trademark?
January 12, 2007
Post by Blog Staff
Can the word "trademark" be a trademark itself? Breckenridge Brewery sells Trademark Pale Ale, which raises this interesting issue. Images of Breckenridge's packaging can be seen below: Under trademark law, there is no restriction on use of "trademark" as a trademark, as long as it meets the statutory requirements. For example, a search of USPTO records indicates that there are .......
Read More


Starbucks loses Korean appeal, Starpreya can continue to use name there
January 12, 2007
Post by Blog Staff
The Korean Supreme Court today denied an appeal by Starbucks to cancel a rival's trademark there. Specifically, the Court noted that Starbucks was not well-known in Korea when the rival coffee provider (who uses a similar logo) registered its trademark. MVS previously blogged about the appeal here. This case, along with the ongoing saga between Budweiser and Budvar, show the difficulties that can arise when.......
Read More


2006 TTAB year in review
January 12, 2007
Post by Blog Staff
John Welch at The TTABlog has compiled a list of all citable opinions of the TTAB in 2006 organized by the substantive legal issue in each decision. This is a useful tool when looking for the most recent TTAB case law on a particular issue. The 57 citable decisions in 2006 are almost double the total number of citable decisions for the past two years: there were only 18 in 2005 and 13 in 2004. Wel.......
Read More


Cisco sues Apple over iPhone trademark
January 11, 2007
Post by Blog Staff
Apple, the company that dominates the digital music player market with the iPod, announced this week at the annual MacWorld show in San Francisco that Apple will be entering another lucrative consumer electronics market: the mobile phone. Apple CEO Steve Jobs announced his company's newest offering: the iPhone. Apple's stock increased 10% just from the announcement of the iPhone, although they will not.......
Read More


Sioux Falls inventor files one millionth electronic trademark application with USPTO
January 10, 2007
Post by Blog Staff
The USPTO recently received the one millionth trademark application filed electronically via its TEAS system. It took just under ten years for the one millionth electronic application to be filed, as the TEAS system first became available in November, 1997. The applicant, Donald Junck of Sioux Falls, South Dakota, was flown out to the USPTO in Alexandria, Virginia, and will take part in a commemoration ceremony .......
Read More


"Use in commerce" not necessary to support trademark opposition, just use in the United States
January 09, 2007
Post by Blog Staff
The Federal Circuit, reversing the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ("TTAB"), found that a Canadian company who arguably only did business in Canada could oppose a trademark application based on "spillover" use of its unregistered trademark in the United States. The Canadian company, First Niagara Insurance Brokers, opposed several trademark applications filed by a United States company, First.......
Read More


Search Posts

Purpose

The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.

Disclaimer

McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole.

Sign Up For Our Newsletter

Enter your name and email address to receive the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Vorhees & Sease, P.L.C.