Filewrapper®

Category:


Is Congress Finally Doing their Constitutional Duty?
June 10, 2019
Post by Oliver P. Couture, Ph.D.
On June 4, 5, and 11, 2019 the Senate Intellectual Property Sub-Committee held hearings regarding the new proposed changes to patent statutes, including to Sections 100, 101, and 112. The Sub-Committee will be hearing from a total of 45 witness on both sides of the debate. Most of the attention during the June 4th and 5th hearings were focused on the reform to Section 101, as will likely the June 11th me.......
Read More


The USPTO Changes Patent Eligibility Guidelines
May 14, 2019
Post by Patricia A. Sweeney - Of Counsel
The United States Patent Office has released updates to subject matter eligibility guidelines under 35 USC §101. Along with these updates, the Office has provided slides and a webinar reviewing the changes, using the same materials provided in training of patent examiners. There are two parts to the analysis, Step 1, and Step 2A and 2B and it is Step 2 that has been changed. Step 1 remains the same, asking w.......
Read More


First Cannabis-Related Patent Makes its Way through the Federal Courts: What it Teaches, and What it Does Not
May 02, 2019
Post by Tina G. Yin Sowatzke, Pharm.D.
Tina G Yin-Sowatzke In the past 25 years, there has been substantial growth surrounding the developments within the cannabis industry, particularly involving intellectual property protections. With legalization of cannabis gaining traction across the United States, any court guidance can provide a foundation for those seeking patent protection. Opportunely, on April 17, 2019, The District Court for the Di.......
Read More


Judicial and Executive Branches split over Subject Matter, New Legislation may be Coming
April 10, 2019
Post by Oliver P. Couture, Ph.D.
Earlier this month the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) heard another appeal in the Cleveland Clinic v. True Health cases. In their appeal, one of Cleveland Clinic’s arguments that their claims were valid was because Skidmore deference should apply to the Examiner’s decision to allow the application to issue in light of the Julitis example (Example 29) of the subject matter guidelines.......
Read More


Athena Diagnostics v. Mayo Collaborative Services Part 2, or: For the Benefit of Us All
February 15, 2019
Post by Oliver P. Couture, Ph.D.
Part 1 of the review of Athena Diagnostics v. Mayo Collaborative reviewed how the Majority Opinion is at odds with precedent and the most recent United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) Subject Matter Guidelines published last month. Part II below examines the dissent from Judge Newman and how it aligns with both precedent and the Guidelines. As stated in Part 1, at issue in Athena was an admi.......
Read More


Athena Diagnostics v. Mayo Collaborative Services Part 1, or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Inconsistencies
February 12, 2019
Post by Oliver P. Couture, Ph.D.
Part 1 of the review of Athena Diagnostics v. Mayo Collaborative will look at how the Majority Opinion is at odds with precedent and the most recent United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) Subject Matter Guidelines published last month. Part 2 will look at the dissent from Judge Newman and how it fits better with both precedent and the Guidelines. At issue in Athena, were methods for detectin.......
Read More


USPTO Updates 101 Guidance: Making Abstract More Concrete
January 08, 2019
Post by Oliver P. Couture, Ph.D.
Recently the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) has announced plans to update their guidance on 101 issues and will do so after a period of public input in order to increase clarity during prosecution. This update will replace, not just update, several sections of MPEP 2106. The update will also provide practitioners a more solid ground to argue 101 issues during prosecution. The first s.......
Read More


Has Alice Killed all the Fun?
January 07, 2019
Post by Oliver P. Couture, Ph.D.
Games, both the physical board and the methods of playing them, have had a long history of patent eligibility. For example, in 1904 Elizabeth Phillips patented the game board for Landlord’s Game, which was then later controversially patented by Charles Darrow in 1934 as Monopoly. While both of these patents were to the physical boards with their distinctive spaces, in 1994 Richard Garfield patented a met.......
Read More


Protecting Your Nanotechnology Inventions - Part 4: Don’t Forget About Trade Secret Protection
December 31, 2018
Post by Jonathan L. Kennedy
When you have a new invention, the right question to ask at the outset is whether you want to consider patenting it. This is important because many common activities in research and commercialization can create a bar to patent protection or at least start a one-year clock by which a patent must be filed. Some of these common activities include presenting or publishing on the technology, testing the techn.......
Read More


AUTM’s Recommends Narrow Changes to NIST on the ROI Initiative
July 27, 2018
Post by Oliver P. Couture, Ph.D.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) recently issued a public Request for Information for the Return on Investment (ROI) Initiative. The Association of Technology Managers (AUTM), who supports the ROI Initiative, stresses in their response that the fundamental principles of the Bayh-Dole Act be preserved. As pointed out by AUTM, Bayh-Dole has significantly contributed to the comm.......
Read More


USPTO Director Andrei Lancu Takes a Look at Early Prosecution
May 24, 2018
Post by Oliver P. Couture, Ph.D.
This week, the USPTO Director, Andrei Iancu, testified before the House Judiciary Committee. In his written statement Director Iancu wrote on topics related to early prosecution that would result in lower costs to clients and would speed up the process of obtaining a patent. A new pilot program that will allow for a pre-search Examiner interview is being planned. The goal of the interview is to allow claim i.......
Read More


Patentability and Patent Protection: Is the Pendulum Starting to Swing Back?
March 23, 2018
Post by Oliver P. Couture, Ph.D.
The latest US Chamber of Commerce Global Innovation Policy Center’s International IP Index still places the US on top overall for intellectual property. However, this is due to strength in enforcement of copyrights and trademarks, and improvements in identifying counterfeit goods before they enter the country. According the to Index, the US has dropped to 12th place out of 50 economies in recent years. T.......
Read More


Just Because It’s Nanoscale, Doesn’t Mean It’s Not a Big Deal
March 09, 2018
Post by Jonathan L. Kennedy
Nanotechnology has been taking innovation by storm for decades now and its only increasing its footprint. This is reflected in the growing number of granted patents and published applications directed to nanotechnology inventions. For example, according to StatNano (an organization that monitors and publishing information regarding nanotechnology global developments), more than 20,000 granted patents and patent .......
Read More


Patenting Abstract Ideas: Technology, Turnstiles, and Transformation
October 19, 2017
Post by Sarah M. Dickhut
On October 18, the Federal Circuit again examined the existing bounds of the patentability of abstract ideas. InSmart Systems Innovations (SSI) v. Chicago Transit Authority, the Federal Circuit determined that SSI’s four patents claimed an abstract idea and were invalid. SSI’s patents were directed to a fare collection system for mass transit (e.g. bus, train, etc.). Instead of using a punch card, cash, .......
Read More


Trading Technologies: Successful Software Patents
January 20, 2017
Post by Blog Staff
In Trading Technologies v. GQG, the Federal Circuit addressed the patentability of software directed to a specific purpose. Trading Technologies owns patents for a computerized method and system for trading stocks, and other related goods. The method relies on improved software and user interface to facilitate stock transactions at a faster and more efficient pace. The sys.......
Read More


Software patents in the Federal Circuit‚¬¦ One step forward, two steps back.
October 12, 2016
Post by Blog Staff
Following the United States Supreme Court's ruling in the Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int'l, (S. Ct. 2014) case (which held that abstract ideas are not patentable), the software and computer industry has been fighting and clawing to peel back the layers of the decision in hopes of finding some clarity as to what is and is not patentable subject matter. In Alice, the Supreme Court held th.......
Read More


Federal Circuit Provides Opening for Patent Eligibility of Software and Computer-Based Inventions
September 16, 2016
Post by Nicholas J. Krob
Nicholas J. Krob The United State Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has provided clarity this week regarding the patent eligibility of computerized processes. On Tuesday, the appellate court issued its ruling in McRO, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games America Inc. et. al., wherein it reversed the lower court's ruling that patents on lip-sync technology were invalid for claiming an abstract idea. .......
Read More


Federal Circuit Finds Patent Eligibility for Application of Natural Law
July 05, 2016
Post by Blog Staff
. . -- Please select --  The Federal Circuit has handed down its decision in Rapid Litigation Management v. CellzDirect.  The technology at issue in the case is a method of freezing-and-thawing a group of hepatocytes and then selecting those that are still viable.  The patent-owner sued the defendant for infringement of the patent, and the defendant in turn filed a motion f.......
Read More


USPTO Releases New Guidance on Life Sciences Patent-Eligible Subject Matter
May 19, 2016
Post by Blog Staff
The United States Patent and Trademark Office has issued new guidance for Subject Matter Eligibility of Life Sciences patents. A memorandum with the subject "Formulating a Subject Matter Eligibility Rejection and Evaluating the Applicant's Response to a Subject Matter Eligibility Rejection" was released May 4, 2016. The Memorandum was accompanied by a new set of subject matter eligibility examples .......
Read More


Applying the USPTO Guidance on Patent Eligibility of Software
December 11, 2015
Post by Blog Staff
-- Please select --                 The Supreme Court's June 25, 2014 decision in Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International, et al., was anticipated as being the case to decide once and for all whether software is patentable. Many were worried the decision would cause the demise of software patents while others hope.......
Read More


Australian High Court Rules Isolated Genes Unpatentable
October 08, 2015
Post by Blog Staff
. Whether or not genes are patent-eligible subject matter has been a much-discussed issue over the last several years. The 2013 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in Ass'n for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. established that that isolated DNA is a product of nature and therefore not patent eligible under Section 101 of Title 35 of the U.S. Code. The patent at issue in the U.S. My.......
Read More


USPTO Issues Updated Guidance on Patent Eligibility
August 03, 2015
Post by Blog Staff
Patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 has been an area of significant change in recent years.  Several Supreme Court decisions have changed our understanding of what does and does not qualify for patent protection.  These decisions, in turn, have required a change in the procedures implemented by the USPTO during the examination of patents. The USPTO has now issued its most recen.......
Read More


"Intangible" Software Unpatentable? - AllVoice Developments v. Microsoft
May 28, 2015
Post by Blog Staff
  In this non-precedential opinion (Fed. Cir. 2015) the Court held claims 60-68 of U.S. Patent No. 5,799,273 (the "'273 Patent‚¬) invalid under 35. U.S.C. § 101 as not being directed to one of the four statutory categories of inventions identified in 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim 60 is set forth below: 60. A universal speech-recognition interface that enables opera.......
Read More


USPTO Releases New Guidelines on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility
December 16, 2014
Post by Blog Staff
The USPTO today released new Guidance on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility. The new guidance comes nearly 9 months after the first set of "2014 Procedure For Subject Matter Eligibility Analysis Of Claims Reciting Or Involving Laws Of Nature/Natural Principles, Natural Phenomena, And/Or Natural Products" were released in March 2014. The March guidelines sought to implement new procedures to address changes in th.......
Read More


Shifting Pre-Trial Strategy in the Wake of Alice and Ultramercial
December 04, 2014
Post by Blog Staff
Four recent Supreme Court cases involving patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Bilski v. Kappos, Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., Ass'n for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., and Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International ) have had the practical effect of heightening the standard for patentability. However, these cases may also be altering the way patent c.......
Read More


Federal Circuit Invalidates Patent Claims As Non-Patentable Subject Matter
August 08, 2014
Post by Blog Staff
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's recent decision in Digitech Image Technologies v. Electronics for Imaging, Inc., upheld a decision that patent claims directed to a collection of numerical data that lacks a physical component or manifestation as well as an abstract idea of organizing data through mathematical correlations are invalid. The plaintiff, Digitech Image Technologies, filed in.......
Read More


USPTO Issues Preliminary Guidance on Patentability Based on Alice Corp.
July 29, 2014
Post by Blog Staff
On June 25, 2014 the USPTO Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy released aMemorandum to the Patent Examining Corps that provides examiners with preliminary instructions related to subject matter eligibility of claims involving abstract ideas under 35 U.S.C. §? 101 in view of the Supreme Court Decision in Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int.......
Read More


Generic Computer Implementation Cannot Save Patent-Ineligible Abstract Idea
June 23, 2014
Post by Blog Staff
On June 19, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated opinion inAlice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int'l. The Petitioner, Alice Corporation ("Alice Corp.") is the assignee of the four patents at issue which disclose method, system, and media claims related to a computerized scheme for mitigating "settlement risk." Respondents CLS Bank International and CLS Services Ltd. ("CLS") o.......
Read More


Federal Circuit Finds Clones Unpatentable
May 12, 2014
Post by Blog Staff
The Federal Circuit issued its opinion in In re Roslin Institute, a case involving cloned animals. The Roslin Institute (Roslin) owns a patent for methods of cloning animals, based on the work that created Dolly the Sheep. The inventors of that patent also assigned to Roslin an application claiming protection for the clones themselves. During prosecution, the USPTO deemed the claims to the clones contained in t.......
Read More


USPTO Issues New Examination Guidelines for Patent Subject Matter Eligibility
April 16, 2014
Post by Blog Staff
The basic requirements for filing a U.S. utility patent are rather straightforward. Patents are granted for new, useful and non-obvious processes, products or compositions of matter. Similarly, any new, useful and non-obvious improvement to these categories of inventions may be granted a patent. Although seemingly straightforward, the three basic requirements for patentability are impacted by an evolving legal lan.......
Read More


Bring on the New Year - What is in Store for IP in 2014?
December 31, 2013
Post by Blog Staff
Happy New Year to all of our FilewrapperÒ followers! We hope 2013 was a productive year and wish you the best in 2014. As the New Year quickly approaches we would like to share with you a few predictions for 2014 for you to look forward to and for which to prepare! · Increased opportunities for quasi-litigation under AIA. Various new mechanisms are available to challenge patents under the Am.......
Read More


New and Useful - July 8, 2013
July 08, 2013
Post by Blog Staff
· The Federal Circuit inUltramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC held that the district court erred in holding that the subject matter of U.S. Patent No. 7,346,545 ('545) is not a "process" within the language and meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 101. The Federal Circuit reversed and remanded this case stating the claims were not abstract and were patent eligible. The '545 patent claims a meth.......
Read More


Supreme Court Addresses Product of Nature Doctrine Relating to Gene Patents
June 13, 2013
Post by Blog Staff
The Supreme Court today handed down its decision in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. The Court held that isolated DNA is a product of nature and not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated, but that complementary DNA (cDNA) is patent eligible because it is not naturally occurring. The Court limited its holding to the patentability of isolated genes and cDNA, concluding t.......
Read More


Federal Circuit Deems Software Patent Ineligible, Provides Little Certainty
May 17, 2013
Post by Blog Staff
In its recent en banc decision inCLS Bank v. Alice Corp, the Federal Circuit has affirmed the finding of subject matter ineligibility of Alice Corp's method and software for management of risk in financial transactions through use of a third party intermediary. The ten-member panel produced seven different decisions, but did not produce any majority opinion. However, seven judges agreed that the method and c.......
Read More


Supreme Court Orders Federal Circuit to Reconsider Patent-Eligibility of Genes
March 30, 2012
Post by Blog Staff
Just six days after it handed down its decision in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., the Supreme Court vacated the Federal Circuit’s decision in Association for Molecular Pathology v. United States Patent and Trademark Office, ordering the appellate court to reconsider the case in light of the Prometheus decision. Order granting cert., vacating judgment, and remanding for further.......
Read More


Supreme Court Clarifies Patentability of Medical Treatments
March 21, 2012
Post by Blog Staff
The Supreme Court recently handed down its unanimous decision in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., No. 10-1150, slip op. (March 20, 2012). The Court specifically considered the patentability of a method for determining the effective levels of a drug to be administered to a patient, and found the claims in question to be unpatentable as “laws of nature.” Although some may .......
Read More


Ultramercial LLC v. Hulu LLC
September 26, 2011
Post by Blog Staff
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently addressed the issue of whether a method of using advertising as a form of currency, to distribute copyrighted products over the internet, constituted patent-eligible subject matter. The court reversed the district court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter eligibility and found the claimed invention fell within patent-eligible subject mat.......
Read More


Federal Circuit reviews "abstract" exception to patent-eligible subject matter
December 28, 2010
Post by Blog Staff
Normal 0 MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New.......
Read More


Federal Circuit determines that method for optimizing dosing of medication is patent eligible
December 21, 2010
Post by Blog Staff
The Federal Circuit on Friday looked at the issue of what constitutes an attempt to patent a natural phenomenon. In Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Services, the Federal Circuit determined that a method for optimizing the dosage of a medication was not directed to a natural phenomenon and therefore was patent-eligible subject matter within the meaning of § 101 of the Patent Act. This is .......
Read More


USPTO publishes interim guidance for assessing patentable subject matter post-Bilski
July 27, 2010
Post by Blog Staff
In a Federal Register notice today, the USPTO has published interim guidance regarding how examiners are to assess whether an application's patent claims fall within the scope of patentable subject matter defined in § 101 in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Bilski. Many patent attorneys were concerned when the initial memo to examiners was released, suggesting the machine-or-transformation te.......
Read More


Supreme Court: Business method patents survive, but barely; Bilski's claims unpatentable
June 29, 2010
Post by Blog Staff
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Bilski v. Kappos, the most recent case at the Court probing the boundaries of patentable subject matter under § 101. Details of the underlying facts of the Bilski case may be found in our post on the Federal Circuit's en banc decision here. All nine Justices agreed that Bilski's method claims were not patentable. All nine Justices also agreed the "machine-.......
Read More


Bilski decided
June 28, 2010
Post by Blog Staff
This morning, the Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Bilski v. Kappos. The court affirmed the Federal Circuit's decision. We'll have more detailed analysis soon. To read the opinion, click here. ....
Read More


Highlights from oral arguments in Bilski v. Kappos
November 11, 2009
Post by Blog Staff
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Bilski v. Kappos in an effort to determine the proper test to be applied to determine whether a claim is patentable subject matter under § 101. The oral argument transcript is available from the Court's website here. Click below for our thoughts on the arguments and some of the more interesting quotes from the Justices' questioning. From the outse.......
Read More


USPTO issues new section 101 guidelines for use until Supreme Court decides Bilski v. Doll
August 28, 2009
Post by Blog Staff
This week the USPTO has issued new guidelines to patent examiners on how to handle § 101 patentable subject matter issues in light of the Federal Circuit's ruling in In re Bilski. The guidelines are distilled into two flow charts and an instructional memo to examiners on how to conduct the analysis. Click below to review the materials in more detail.The flow charts are reproduced below: The flow cha.......
Read More


Supreme Court grants certiorari in Bilski
June 01, 2009
Post by Blog Staff
In an order today, the Supreme Court agreed to hear an appeal in Bilski v. Doll regarding the patentability of method claims. Back in October, the Federal Circuit decided In re Bilski, adopting the "machine-or-transformation" test as the exclusive test to determine whether a method is drawn to patentable subject matter. Bilski filed a petition for certiorari in January. Some thought the Court may t.......
Read More


Marketing methods not patentable subject matter: no machine or transformation
April 21, 2009
Post by Blog Staff
In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit applied the machine-or-transformation test from Bilski to affirm the rejection of all pending claims in a patent application by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. The claims at issue related to methods of marketing products and "paradigms" for marketing software. The Board held all claims were not directed to patentable subject matter because they.......
Read More


Bilski: No machine or transformation, no patentable method, at least for now
November 03, 2008
Post by Blog Staff
As we reported Thursday, the Federal Circuit has decided In re Bilski, an en banc decision regarding the scope of patentable subject matter. Specifically, the court addressed what is necessary for a method to fall within the scope of patentable subject matter under § 101.The court, after examining the relevant Supreme Court cases on the subject (such as Diehr, Benson, and Flook), the court adopted the &qu.......
Read More


Bilski decided
October 30, 2008
Post by Blog Staff
The decision is available here. It adopts the "machine-or-transformation" test for patentable subject matter. As stated by the majority:The machine-or-transformation test is a two-branched inquiry; an applicant may show that a process claim satisfies § 101 either by showing that his claim is tied to a particular machine, or by showing that his claim transforms an article.Click below for some quote.......
Read More


Thursday at the Federal Circuit: In re Bilski oral arguments on scope of patentable subject matter
May 06, 2008
Post by Blog Staff
This Thursday, the Federal Circuit will hear oral arguments en banc in In re Bilski (No. 2007-1130), a case that will help define the scope of patentable subject matter. Numerous amicus briefs have been filed in the case, and perhaps most interestingly, two of the amici, Bank of America and Regulatory DataCorp, have been granted permission to participate in the oral arguments.More information about the case and.......
Read More


Federal Circuit to consider overruling State Street en banc
February 15, 2008
Post by Blog Staff
The Federal Circuit has, on its own motion, decided to hear a case en banc regarding the scope of patentable subject matter under § 101. The case, In re Bilski (No. 2007-1130), was argued before a panel of the court on October 1, 2007, and deals with the patentability of methods that involve only mental steps. Most interestingly, however, is that in the court's decision to hear the case en banc, the c.......
Read More


No en banc rehearing for case holding "signals" not patentable subject matter
February 11, 2008
Post by Blog Staff
In a precedential order today, the Federal Circuit denied a petition for rehearing en banc in In re Nuijten. In that case, a panel of the court held that claims drawn to a "signal" did not fall into any of the statutory categories of patentable subject matter and were thus unpatentable under § 101. Judge Linn dissented from that decision, applying the § 101 framework from Diamond v. Chakrab.......
Read More


Claims to a "method for mandatory arbitration resolution" not drawn to statutory subject matter
September 24, 2007
Post by Blog Staff
In the second of two decisions regarding the scope of patentable subject matter on Thursday, the Federal Circuit found claims in a patent application directed toward a "method for mandatory arbitration resolution" as not directed toward statutory subject matter under § 101. The USPTO had not addressed the statutory subject matter issue, rather the Federal Circuit had requested supplemental briefi.......
Read More


Claims to "signal" with no reference to physical structure not patentable subject matter
September 20, 2007
Post by Blog Staff
In the first of two decisions today regarding the scope of statutory subject matter, the Federal Circuit held that claims directed toward a "signal" were not statutory subject matter under § 101. Earlier, the USPTO allowed claims directed toward a method of embedding data in a signal; the rejected claims were the reverse: they were the signals with the data embedded as opposed to a method for doi.......
Read More


View all Filewrapper® Posts

Search Posts

Purpose

The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.

Disclaimer

McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole.

Connect with MVS

Enter your name and email address to recieve the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.