Today's opinions in KSR v. Teleflex and Microsoft v. AT&T

Posted At : April 30, 2007 9:48 AM | Posted By : Blog Staff
Related Categories: International,Supreme Court,Obviousness,Patents

Click here for the opinion in KSR v. Teleflex.

Click here for the opinion in Microsoft v. AT&T.

More to come once we've had a chance to review the decisions. 

Comments (2) | Print | Send | del.icio.us | Digg It! | Linking Blogs | 501 Views
Comments (Comment Moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until approved.)
[Add Comment]
Wow, thanks for the SPEEDY publication; how did you get this before it was published on the slip opinion page? THANKS!
# Posted By Cassie | 4/30/07 9:56 AM
From KSR we find the court stating that the proper question to ask for obviousness was:

"whether a pedal designer of ordinary skill, facing the wide range of needs created by developments in the field of endeavor, would have seen a benefit to upgrading Asano with a sensor."

or in general

"whether a [person] of ordinary skill, facing the wide range of needs created by developments in the field of endeavor, would have seen a benefit [in combining two or more pieces of prior art]."
# Posted By Kirk Goodwin | 4/30/07 12:31 PM
[Add Comment]
BlogCFC was created by Raymond Camden. This blog is running version 5.8.001.